Basic Essay Writing Rubric
![]()
| Name: _______________________________ | Teacher: Mrs. Hancock | |||
| Date: August 8, 2009 | Class: English 7 | |||
| Description: This rubric will help you know exactly what I am expecting to find in an essay. | ||||
|
5 / Excellent
|
4 / Very Good
|
3 / Average
|
2 / Needs Improvement
|
1 / Unacceptable
|
|
| Ideas | This paper is clear and focused. It holds the reader's attention. Relevant details and quotes enrich the central theme. | This paper is mostly focused, and has some good details and quotes. | The writer is beginning to define the topic, even though development is still basic or general. | Topic is not well-defined and/or there are too many topics. | As yet, the paper has no clear sense of purpose or central theme. To extract meaning from the text, the reader must make inferences based on sketchy or missing details. |
| Organization | The organization enhances and showcases the central idea or theme. The order, structure of information is compelling and moves the reader through the text. | Paper (and paragraphs) are mostly organized, in order, and makes sense to the reader. | The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. | Sentences within paragraphs make sense, but the order of paragraphs does not. | The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details, or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; there is no identifiable internal structure. |
| Sentence Fluency | The writing has an easy flow, rhythm, and cadence. Sentences are well built, with strong and varied structure that invites expressive oral reading. | The writing mostly flows, and usually invites oral reading. | The text hums along with a steady beat, but tends to be more businesslike than musical, more mechanical than fluid. | The text seems choppy and is not easy to read orally. | The reader has to practice quite a bit in order to give this paper a fair interpretive reading. |
| Conventions | The writer demonstrates a good grasp of standard writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, usage, paragraphing) and uses conventions effectively to enhance readability. | The write understands good writing conventions and usually uses them correctly. Paper is easily read and errors are rare; minor touch-ups would get this piece ready to publish. | The writer shows reasonable control over a limited range of standard writing conventions. Conventions are sometimes handled well and enhance readability; at other times, errors are distracting and impair readability. | The writer seems to have made little effort to use conventions: spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage, grammar and/or paragraphing have multiple errors. | Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage, and grammar and/or paragraphing repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. |
| Presentation | The form and presentation of the text enhances the ability for the reader to understand and connect with the message. It is pleasing to the eye. | The format only has a few mistakes and is generally easy to read and pleasing to the eye. | The writer's message is understandable in this format. | The writer's message is only understandable occasionally, and paper is messily written. | The reader receives a garbled message due to problems relating to the presentation of the text, and is not typed. |
|
|
A service of the Utah Education Network Comments, e-mail: resources@uen.org |
|